TRUMAN SIMONS DEPO #2

Truman Simons lied in a deposition years ago about having an extramarital affair with Sherre Johnston. He said that his marriage broke up but failed to mention the reason was that he was involved with another woman. This is the second deposition where he has to admit it, duhhh.

This Paw Paw Fatty shit about Truman being a “friend of the family” is just bullshit, so we are reprinting the fun fun deposition.

Sherre just lies and lies, it’s everyone else’s fault, PTSD, hitting her head, never her. EVER. No thoughts on her husband, no Christianity when it comes to adultery and her friends just go on and on supporting her.

THIS IS that depo.


>  6      Q.  When did the relationship with Sherry
> start?
>  7      A.  Do what?
>  8      Q.  The relationship, the extramarital
>  9  relationship that you’re having?  Isn’t her
> name
> 10  Sherry?
> 11      A.  Okay.  Probably in November.
> 12      Q.  November of 2000?
> 13      A.  Yes, sir.
> 14      Q.  And is that when the actual affair
> started or
> 15  is that when you all first met or what
> significant date
> 16  is that?
> 17      A.  I met her about a year before that.
> 18      Q.  Okay.  And kind of generally take me
> as to
> 19  what happened between the two of you in the
> year period
> 20  of time from when you met until the
> relationship became
> 21  an affair?
> 22                MR. DEACONSON:  I’m going to
> object.  You
> 23  don’t have to answer that.  That’s wholly
> irrelevant.
> 24      Q.  (BY MR. DE DIEGO) Well, the reason I’m
> asking
> 25  is because you have claimed to have been
> mentally
> 0287
>  1  anguished as a result of the statements made by
> my
>  2  clients, and I think I’m entitled — and you’ve
> also
>  3  said that you were affected by the breakup or
> the
>  4  potential breakup with your wife, and I want to
> know
>  5  what involvement that has to do with the
> breakup with
>  6  your wife in relation to anything else that may
> have
>  7  happened as a result of my — my clients’
> allegedly
>  8  defamatory statements.
>  9                MR. DEACONSON:  Well, you asked
> him
> 10  what — when the alleged affair started.  He
> told you
> 11  that date.  Anything else before that has
> nothing to do
> 12  with anything and I think —
> 13                MR. DE DIEGO:  Well, the reason I
> ask —
> 14                MR. DEACONSON:  — I think that’s
> just
> 15  harassment —
> 16                MR. DE DIEGO:  No, it really
> isn’t —
> 17                MR. DEACONSON:  — and I’m going
> to tell
> 18  him he doesn’t have to answer.
> 19                MR. DE DIEGO:  — Mr. Deaconson,
> and let
> 20  me explain why.  The reason I wanted to know
> what was
> 21  the course of the affair is because it may have
> taken a
> 22  long time for it to become an affair, but
> during that
> 23  period of time it may have had an effect on Mr.
> Simons’
> 24  marriage before it actually became an affair
> that I
> 25  think I’m entitled to get into to see if that’s
> a
> 0288
>  1  potential cause of the stress or mental anguish
> that
>  2  Mr. Simons is claiming in this case.
>  3                MR. DEACONSON:  Well, you know —
>  4                THE WITNESS:  Can we talk a
> minute?
>  5                MR. DEACONSON:  Yeah.
>  6                THE WITNESS:  Can we go off the
> record a
>  7  second?
>  8                MR. DE DIEGO:  Yes, sir.
>  9                THE VIDEOGRAPHER:  We’re going
> off the
> 10  record at 1:27.
> 11                (Recess 1:27 to 1:32.)
> 12                THE VIDEOGRAPHER:  We’re on the
> record at
> 13  1:32.
> 14      Q.  (BY MR. DE DIEGO) My previous
> question, Mr.
> 15  Simons, was you mentioned you had started
> having your
> 16  dealings with Sherry — by the way, what’s her
> last
> 17  name?
> 18      A.  I’d just as soon not give her last
> name.
> 19      Q.  Okay.  You started having your
> dealings with
> 20  Sherry approximately a year before November of
> 2001
> 21  when you started having the affair with her?
> 22      A.  That’s correct.
> 23      Q.  And my question was:  Generally what
> 24  transpired between the two of you during that
> period of
> 25  time from about a year before sometime in
> November of
> 0289
>  1  1999 through November of 2000?
>  2      A.  Do you want me to start with how I
> first met
>  3  her?
>  4      Q.  Yeah, how you met her and what
> happened and
>  5  how the relationship became an affair.
>  6      A.  Okay.  I was investigating a murder
> case that
>  7  she had an interest in, and she came to my
> office and
>  8  asked me to not get involved in the
> investigation of
>  9  the case because she had read all the stuff
> about me in
> 10  the papers and on the Internet.  And I told her
> that I
> 11  was a captain at the Sheriff’s Office and that
> I was in
> 12  charge of all the criminal investigations and I
> was
> 13  already involved in the investigation of that
> murder
> 14  case and that I didn’t think that anything that
> had
> 15  been said in the paper would jeopardize the
> potential
> 16  prosecution of that case.  She also went to the
>
> 17  District Attorney’s Office and talked with them
> to try
> 18  to get them to keep me from being involved in
> the
> 19  investigation, and they told them that they
> didn’t have
> 20  any authority to do that.
> 21                And then we successfully resolved
> that
> 22  murder case as far as from the investigation
> 23  standpoint.  We arrested two people; we got a
> 24  confession from one.  And then her and her
> mother would
> 25  infrequently come in the office over the course
> of that
> 0290
>  1  next year inquiring about the case.  And I
> talked
=== message truncated ===

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “TRUMAN SIMONS DEPO #2

    1. The documents don’t lie. What matters is that we get rid of it NOW……..Parnell…………plus the commissioners etc. because they know and let it go on.

Leave a Reply