Here is my Jake Burson “Snickers” the Raccoon meme, he enjoyed being so mean to me for years when he had powe over us all as a big Ranger. Bet he and his buddies had many a good laugh at my expense. Now, 800,000 people in this world have given me the power to get even with him a bit. I wonder if he’s just mean to women? Notice dismissed me so much he never, ever even saw me a ‘comin.
Oh, well,
“Hurts, don’t it”…………..
The process involved in my Petition to Remove Parnell from Office and also the one to Remove Josh Tetens from Office are not like regular lawsuits or criminal proceedings in that the law was made to eliminate the “good old boys”. Seems the tatooed lady and “Snickers” don’t realize this isn’t going to be stopped HERE.
I would also like to point out that I have asked the Rangers to investigate the Hefele murder (The Rangers have a Cold Case Unit now btw) for probablly over 20 years and they still have not. They think I should give up and they shouldn’t solve it I guess, the last few years of me asking, I got Jake Burson.
Jake Burson enjoyed his power over me as a Ranger. I am sure he and his buddies all laughed at me much like I howl with glee at calling him a shit eating raccoon named “Snickers”. He used his power and I use mine as a blogger who, under Free Speech, likes satire and Jake just never thought any WOMAN would ever get even.
Sad, but Narcissists are like that.
Tell them, “I can’t read it FOR you”, please.
Jake knows Parnell used Crawley to do work at his house on the County dime. Jake knows everyone knows he is so far up Par’s butt it’s pitiful and no one respects Jake. Duhh. They are very un self aware. They are having fits NOW because after all the things they have done to me they didn’t think I had anything left but, they were wrong.
House Bill 2715 was written FOR THE PEOPLE. It was written to get circumstances and justice out of the good old boy counties.
My petitions against Parnell and Tetens have started and they will have to answer questions. Questions that never even got asked of them HERE. Think about that for a moment.
No one dared ask Parnell if he worked Crawley, no one dared to ask Tetens why he covered it up and does nothing yet knows it’s true.
These men represent the law in this county.
House Bill 2715 was written for you, and it surely was written for Harry Storm.
Below, to help the tatooed lady and her pet raccoon since they don’t know how to google and waste tax payers money trying to “get” an old woman that doesn’t even drive is the law. Yawn.
Notice all this time, THEY NEVER GAVE IN TO ONE THING. EVIDENCE LOCKER, HORSES THAT WANDERED UP, GUN LOCKER, MISSING MONEY FROM WHEN LYNCH WAS IN OFFICE, OTHER MISSING MONEY, deputies side swiping a car in Dallas, on and on. NOTHING.
They are happy thinking everyone is stupid but them.
I have more files than they ever had, I have everything. Ask David Littlewood and his lawyer how prepared I come in.
I dare you.
Tick tock.
H
house bill 2715
Texas House Bill 2715 streamlines and standardizes the legal process for citizens to remove local public officials and rogue prosecutors from office. [1, 2]
Key Details
- Sponsorship: Authored by State Representative Pat Curry (R-Waco) and passed during the 89th Texas Legislature.
- Effective Date: Signed and enacted into law, taking effect immediately on June 20, 2025.
- Core Purpose: Also known as the “People’s Veto,” the law updates Chapter 87 of the Texas Local Government Code to make holding local officials (like county judges and district attorneys) accountable more efficient. [1, 2, 3, 4]
How the Process Works
- Clear Petitions: Removal petitions must use clear language and state specific facts about the alleged acts of incompetency or official misconduct. [1, 2]
- Judicial Oversight: Petitions go to the presiding judge of the administrative judicial region instead of outdated local channels. [1]
- Conflict of Interest Rules: The presiding judge must assign a district court judge from a completely different judicial district to handle the case. [1]
- Outside Representation: A prosecuting attorney from another county or district is appointed to represent the state in the removal proceedings. [1]
