I already heard this was coming.
What is the burden of proof for probable cause in Texas “timeliness” – Google Search
Suppression of Evidence (Search & Seizure)
Goldstein & Orrhttps://www.goldsteinhilley.com › legal-resources › sup…
AFFIDAVIT TOTALLY LACKING IN PROBABLE CAUSE 3; FACIALLY DEFICIENT WARRANT 4; TIMELINESS 4; RELIABILITY OF INFORMANT AND/OR INFORMATION: 4; RELIANCE ON
Dear Becky and Par and Char,
I’ve already been warned about this move. Unless Becky Boyer is just so incredibly upset and offended that she decided to do the collage below NOW. Right? She’s doing this because Par’s mad and wants to search my place, get my computer and find out who tells me his b.s. Kind of funny as I keep telling him it’s everyone.
To get a warrant to run a Search you have to have something that’s “timely”, recent. If you notice Harry stopped writing about weed a long time back and your snippets below are “too old” under the law.
The fictional character Harry Storm talked about weed, Harry wrote about that, but, Harry is a fictional character and none of it exists.
#1. Get timely post. You’ll find nothing about weed from Harry the last two or so years, that’s how long Par’s plot has been brewing.
#2. I’ve already been warned about this move from an ex deputy buddy of ole Par, and can assure you that my attorney and others have been informed about the revenge move against me. Maybe you could look up the Statute on Official Oppression..
#3. A Judge would have to sign the warrant.
Parnell actually got this idea from Truman that’s how old this is.
Below is Becky’s artsy post, wow, this should scare the kiddies.
They’re just using Becky like they did Lisa but they paid Lisa.
Party on.
H
