Let me spell this out for you two, if the MCSO was this big “Happy Family” then why did so many of them call and tell me right after the meeting and boy, did we laugh at you two.

Read the room.

Also, while you’re at it, go below and read some law. Do you really want to answer questions about this????

How dumb are you two anyway?

Harry’s not alone anymore, we’ll file all manner of Petitions against you, dumb, dumb, dumb.

No, they don’t ask a lawyer because they don’t want to know, are too stupid to ask, and because the lawyer would begin the answer with the words “Have you lost your gawddamn mind”, so they just do stuff……much like a chihuhua dog.

No thought, just one idiot action after another.

H

The Ozempic Faced Tatooed Lady who is paid about 123K now, the 2024 pay was 71,648 and she has been promoted since them to over 100K. The reason for bringing this up is that she’s being paid over 100K to mess with FACEBOOK and this ironic notion of the MCSO HAPPY FAMILY. To bring the public back to being all happy with the MCSO and have faith again. Much like Tinkerbell fading begging, “believe, believe”, well, we don’t believe. We believe you spend too much money and can’t keep anybody.

If this doesn’t make a person angry enough, next, is almost clever, but it’s not, it’s just more of the Kabuki theatre and the fact that Jake and Bambi think we’re all stupid. We think that because he’s a young Ranger and she shows her tits a lot we’re supposed to fall for this as some quazi happy Christian thing. We don’t.

The deputies in Bambi’s unit have been enlisted to go to functions and eat rubber chicken and hobnob with the who’s who on the WEEKENDS, and, needless to say. They don’t want to. That’s how I heard about it.

Let’s also pause a moment and think about how desperate you have to be to get David Ives to go eat some pancakes or rubber chicken and yuk it up about you, ohmygawd.

Ives was a pretty stand up guy until he decided he loved what Snickers was putting out, then, he went to the Dark Side too. Sad, but having him campaign for you? No, baby, oh, turn off that one.

Once again, we have a couple who just cannot grasp that they are not liked.

We hear that the Commissioners have told Jake that if Par resigns that he (Jake) will not be appointed.

Let us stop and pause that they did the right thing.

SO, now Bambi is going to enlist her campaign army of “Baby Rangers” (kind of makes you throw up a little in your mouth), to campaign under the guise of showing the Public the HAPPY MCSO FAMILY.

Let this sink in, folks.

These people have an answer for everything, don’t they.

Brandi Burson L Overview

Brandi Burson L in 2024 was employed at McLennan County and had an annual salary of $71,648, according to public records. This salary was 84 percent higher than the average and 63 percent higher than the median salary in McLennan County.

Public records show Brandi Burson L working for McLennan County from 2019 to 2025.

According to the public records employee’s salary increased by $1,781 from 2023 to 2024, which is a 2.6 percent rise. Since 2019, the salary has increased by $13,660, a total rise of 23.6 percent.

can deputies be made to go to campaign events and campaign

No, sheriff’s deputies cannot legally be forced to attend campaign events or engage in political campaigning.

Under federal, state, and local laws, elected officials (such as sheriffs) are strictly prohibited from coercing subordinates into performing political services, and public employees are heavily restricted from campaigning while on duty.

AI Mode Conversation: can deputies be made to go to campaign events and campaign

can deputies be made to go to campaign events and campaign

No, sheriff’s deputies cannot legally be forced to attend campaign events or engage in political campaigning.

Under federal, state, and local laws, elected officials (such as sheriffs) are strictly prohibited from coercing subordinates into performing political services, and public employees are heavily restricted from campaigning while on duty.

Key Legal Protections & Restrictions

• No Forced Political Service: Statutes across most jurisdictions, such as the Texas Local Government Code, explicitly state that law enforcement officers cannot be required to render a political service or contribute to a political fund. [1]
• Protection Against Retaliation: A sheriff cannot legally fire, demote, or otherwise penalize a deputy for refusing to participate in a political campaign. [1]
• On-Duty Campaigning Prohibited: Even if a deputy wants to volunteer, police officers and deputies are legally barred from participating in political campaigns while on active duty or in uniform. This includes making speeches, distributing literature, or openly soliciting votes. [1, 2]
• Misuse of Public Resources: Forcing on-duty deputies to attend a campaign event violates laws against using public resources (taxpayer-funded salaries, vehicles, and equipment) for private political gain, which can result in criminal prosecution. [1, 2]

The Exception: Official Duties

The only scenario where a deputy can be required to attend a campaign event is to provide official law enforcement security or traffic control. In these instances, the deputy is there strictly to maintain public safety, not to endorse, support, or campaign for any candidate. [1]

AI responses may include mistakes. For legal advice, consult a professional. Learn more

• Center for Public IntegrityWhy the Trump campaign won’t pay police bills – Public IntegrityJun 13, 2019 — Several have required the Trump campaign to sign a contract or similar agreement to pay various expenses and fees at their municip…
• Texas Constitution and Statutes (.gov)Texas Constitution and Statutes Home pageAccording to the Local Government Code, police officers in uniform or on active duty cannot engage in political activities related…
• Texas Ethics CommissionPolitical Subdivision Political AdvertisingClass A misdemeanor A violation of this prohibition could also lead to the imposition of fines by the Ethics Commission or to crim…

Show all

give me the definition of coercion in this case

Coercion in this context means a sheriff using their official authority, power over employment, or implicit threats of retaliation to force a deputy to participate in political activities against their will.

How Coercion Manifests in Law Enforcement

• Abuse of the Chain of Command: A sheriff uses the hierarchical structure of the department to blur the line between a lawful work order and a political demand, making it difficult for a subordinate to feel safe saying no.
• Implicit or Explicit Threats: Making it clear—either through direct words or subtle hints—that refusing to work a campaign event will result in negative consequences, such as bad shift assignments, denied promotions, or formal discipline.
• Employment Leverage: Taking advantage of an “at-will” or vulnerable employment status to make deputies feel that their job security depends on personal or political loyalty to the elected sheriff rather than the oath of office.
• Creating a Hostile Work Environment: Punishing or ostracizing deputies who do not show up to political rallies by isolating them or giving them undesirable duties.

Under many state laws, using a public position to pressure employees into political service crosses the line into official oppression or official misconduct.

Would you like to know about the specific legal penalties a sheriff can face for coercing deputies, or how an officer can report this behavior?